Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Sandgaard ownership discussion 2022-3 onwards (Meeting with CAST p138)
Comments
-
Yep.The Red Robin said:Didn’t Roderick always own Ujpest?1 -
Yesssss, he probably agreed to sell both plots to Sandgaard......at a hefty price.DubaiCAFC said:Don’t know how true, but heard RD has agreed to sell the valley and TG. TS is still playing hard ball from my understanding, asking for too much for the club it’s self. PV wants as many there so the buyer can see the potential.
Not sure who the buying party is, as I have heard US money and also heard Middle Eastern.
I would say don’t get to excited yet0 -
In namePragueAddick said:
Yep.The Red Robin said:Didn’t Roderick always own Ujpest?0 -
No, it was DaverickThe Red Robin said:Didn’t Roderick always own Ujpest?3 -
Seated next to Mr Sandgaard at the Gala Dinner last night was our very own cheese sandwich man in what I can only describe as intense companionship mode.
10 -
I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.9
-
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.3 -
I'd actually enjoy that.superclive98 said:
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.
I would spend about 10 minutes telling him exactly what I think of him.
And then accidentally spill my soup in his lap.
13 - Sponsored links:
-
I like your style !blackpool72 said:
I'd actually enjoy that.superclive98 said:
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.
I would spend about 10 minutes telling him exactly what I think of him.
And then accidentally spill my soup in his lap.0 -
Spill it first when it’s at least lukewarm! 😉blackpool72 said:
I'd actually enjoy that.superclive98 said:
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.
I would spend about 10 minutes telling him exactly what I think of him.
And then accidentally spill my soup in his lap.2 -
blackpool72 said:
I'd actually enjoy that.superclive98 said:
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.
I would spend about 10 minutes telling him exactly what I think of him.
And then accidentally spill my soup in his lap.
Great euphemism and for all his many faults he is a looker.18 -
While the special guests were being introduced to the crowd the little shit was sitting there chewing gum showing no interest at all, prick0
-
I have no words to reply to this.🤢RodneyCharltonTrotta said:blackpool72 said:
I'd actually enjoy that.superclive98 said:
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.
I would spend about 10 minutes telling him exactly what I think of him.
And then accidentally spill my soup in his lap.
Great euphemism and for all his many faults he is a looker.1 -
Tongues ?seth plum said:Seated next to Mr Sandgaard at the Gala Dinner last night was our very own cheese sandwich man in what I can only describe as intense companionship mode.
2 -
Cock-a-leekie?blackpool72 said:
I'd actually enjoy that.superclive98 said:
Why was the little snivel-shit even there? Imagine paying that money to be there and ending up sat on a table with him!bobmunro said:I think Seth means burger boy was sitting next to guitar boy and they seemed to be getting on very well.
I would spend about 10 minutes telling him exactly what I think of him.
And then accidentally spill my soup in his lap.6 -
Suppose it shows rock on Thommy’s true colours if that’s who he has affiliated himself with and gravitated towards, all makes sense really, classless clueless potless.8
- Sponsored links:
-
I see the good Dr Raelynn hasn't been re tweeting all things CAFC much on Twitter lately. She used to be very active.
Another sign of the novelty wearing thin?4 -
This is just what 99% of rich people are likeEugenesAxe said:Suppose it shows rock on Thommy’s true colours if that’s who he has affiliated himself with and gravitated towards, all makes sense really, classless clueless potless.0 -
TS must have reached the point where he has realised that his enthusiasm is not enough to get the club out of this league.
Our squad is made up of youth players and pros who seem to be decent but injury-prone. None of them are robotic enough for results not to affect them - I'm sure they want to win every game, but mental toughness for 90 minutes seems to elude them.
It hasn't all been terrible - there have been moments when the football has been excellent. But we don't seem to be able to grind out results in this League.
Whose fault is this? In my view, the buck stops with the guy at the top because he employs everyone else. The manager is probably okay but he needs to be supported both financially and behind the scenes during the next transfer window. If TS is not prepared to invest, then I'm afraid he doesn't understand the way football works. Therefore, if I was going to take a banner to the next game it would simply say 'INVEST OR SELL', because anything else will not see us enjoying the delights of the New Den again anytime soon.12 -
Garners recent comments show how frustrated he is, and quite rightly so. His team selection against Cheltenham said it all - Squad not big enough or good enough and with TS sitting in the stand watching Garner did the equivalent of smacking him around the head with a kipper. Whether or not Garner survives much longer is another question but who in their right mind would want to replace him ?
Unless TS has some other relatives he can bring over.........................0 -
I believe this to be correct 😉carly burn said:I see the good Dr Raelynn hasn't been re tweeting all things CAFC much on Twitter lately. She used to be very active.
Another sign of the novelty wearing thin?1 -
Yea , I think it shows he’s not such a good guy after all.Leuth said:
This is just what 99% of rich people are likeEugenesAxe said:Suppose it shows rock on Thommy’s true colours if that’s who he has affiliated himself with and gravitated towards, all makes sense really, classless clueless potless.1 -
Getting rid of Garner solves nothing and will cost Sandgaard money that he doesn’t want to spend. There’s no Lee Bowyer or Johnnie Jackson sitting behind the scenes as a cheap option. If Sandgaard wants out we’ll see nothing spent unless it’s absolutely essential.MikeBaileysFanClub said:Garners recent comments show how frustrated he is, and quite rightly so. His team selection against Cheltenham said it all - Squad not big enough or good enough and with TS sitting in the stand watching Garner did the equivalent of smacking him around the head with a kipper. Whether or not Garner survives much longer is another question but who in their right mind would want to replace him ?
Unless TS has some other relatives he can bring over.........................6 -
Even if he doesn't want out we'll see nothing spent unless it's absolutely essential!ShootersHillGuru said:
Getting rid of Garner solves nothing and will cost Sandgaard money that he doesn’t want to spend. There’s no Lee Bowyer or Johnnie Jackson sitting behind the scenes as a cheap option. If Sandgaard wants out we’ll see nothing spent unless it’s absolutely essential.MikeBaileysFanClub said:Garners recent comments show how frustrated he is, and quite rightly so. His team selection against Cheltenham said it all - Squad not big enough or good enough and with TS sitting in the stand watching Garner did the equivalent of smacking him around the head with a kipper. Whether or not Garner survives much longer is another question but who in their right mind would want to replace him ?
Unless TS has some other relatives he can bring over.........................4 -
Oh my god, how will we know which option he’s chosen?superclive98 said:
Even if he doesn't want out we'll see nothing spent unless it's absolutely essential!ShootersHillGuru said:
Getting rid of Garner solves nothing and will cost Sandgaard money that he doesn’t want to spend. There’s no Lee Bowyer or Johnnie Jackson sitting behind the scenes as a cheap option. If Sandgaard wants out we’ll see nothing spent unless it’s absolutely essential.MikeBaileysFanClub said:Garners recent comments show how frustrated he is, and quite rightly so. His team selection against Cheltenham said it all - Squad not big enough or good enough and with TS sitting in the stand watching Garner did the equivalent of smacking him around the head with a kipper. Whether or not Garner survives much longer is another question but who in their right mind would want to replace him ?
Unless TS has some other relatives he can bring over.........................5 -
Whoever it is should proceed with the purchase and takeover the current lease.DubaiCAFC said:Don’t know how true, but heard RD has agreed to sell the valley and TG. TS is still playing hard ball from my understanding, asking for too much for the club it’s self. PV wants as many there so the buyer can see the potential.
Not sure who the buying party is, as I have heard US money and also heard Middle Eastern.
I would say don’t get to excited yet0
