Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
NFL Season 2013/14.
Comments
-
Food prices were through the roof so I only got a programme0
-
'One year, you'll be able to tell your Grandkids you watched Peyton Manning play football.'0
-
But he plays for Denver ...0
-
Superbowl in 84? Destroyed them. Come on raiders.northstandsteve said:Hate redskins with a passion, first game I ever saw on C4 was Raiders v Redskins,
0 -
Week 4 wins for:
New England, Buffalo, Cleveland, Seattle, Detroit (poxy lions), Indianapolis, Kansas, Minnesota, Arizona, Tennessee, Denver, San Diego & Washington, winning 24-14. Never in doubt.......0 -
Sign of a winning team, Pats playing shoddy football, Brady throwing guys into the ground left right and centre, and yet we're 4-0. Bigger tests to come obviously, but the Gronk is close to a return and no huddle football appears to be the future!0
-
Broncos' offense is absolutely ridiculous0
-
Piss poor Brady today, blew his chance of longest passing TD streak and must have been sacked or hurried about a million Times today, will really miss Wilfork now he's out all season, and we still miss the Gronk0
-
I tell you what - there's no defense on display at all, but this might be one of the best games I've ever seen.0
-
71 points so far, a whole quarter left, it's like watching a PlayStation game of American football...0
- Sponsored links:
-
Btw love the pink accessories for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, wouldn't mind seeing us adopt something similar, maybe for prostrate cancer?
79 points now, Cowboys 2 touchdowns in quick succession0 -
As a chiefs fan i would love dallas to win this one.0
-
Denver should have this now running plays to wind the clock down and a field goal with a few seconds left? 48-48 at the moment with a minute to go0
-
51-48 to the Broncos crazy game0
-
Best game I've seen in a long time.0
-
Extra tickets for the 49ers game at Wembley on sale on Tuesday at 10am0
-
Jags, Falcons and Raiders are playing a game each at Wembley next year0
-
Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
Jags are 0-5, Falcons are 1-4, Raiders are 2-3.0 -
Well this is a bit of an odd year for the Falcons to be fair, been consistently very good in recent years. Raiders suck but are still one of the biggest franchises in the league name wise, see loads of people in Raiders caps in London.
It's good that more games are coming over here but it does seem weird for there to be 3 international games and they are all in London. Thought the next step would be for a game in Mexico or Germany. Bills have one in Canada still I think?0 -
The Bills one in Canada is a pre-season game I do believe0
- Sponsored links:
-
NFL want a London franchise, maybe as early as 2015.0
-
But they might be playing what you consider to be 'good' teams.SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
Jags are 0-5, Falcons are 1-4, Raiders are 2-3.
Each team is giving up one of only 8 home games. Raiders and jaguars both looking to move stadiums and this probably helps put the pressure on their local councils to getting planning permission and part funding. Not sure bout Atlanta and their stadium situation.0 -
Yeah agree the Falcons are having an off year.hudson-son-son said:Well this is a bit of an odd year for the Falcons to be fair, been consistently very good in recent years. Raiders suck but are still one of the biggest franchises in the league name wise, see loads of people in Raiders caps in London.
It's good that more games are coming over here but it does seem weird for there to be 3 international games and they are all in London. Thought the next step would be for a game in Mexico or Germany. Bills have one in Canada still I think?
I guess it makes sense that big games stay in America (imagine if Man Utd-Man City was played in China), and the British public will buy tickets for the 'NFL' brand rather than the teams on show.
The most likely team to turn into London Bulldogs (or whatever) is the Jaguars.0 -
Atlanta are building a brand new stadium less than a mile from their current stadium but that's a done deal. I think this is just a branding exercise for them to gain a bigger worldwide audience.MrOneLung said:
But they might be playing what you consider to be 'good' teams.SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
Jags are 0-5, Falcons are 1-4, Raiders are 2-3.
Each team is giving up one of only 8 home games. Raiders and jaguars both looking to move stadiums and this probably helps put the pressure on their local councils to getting planning permission and part funding. Not sure bout Atlanta and their stadium situation.
0 -
Definately having the Raiders game. Not a big name you are having a laugh.0
-
They're a big name because of their association with the LA street gangs of the 80s and 90s who wore their caps and jerseys, making them fashionable. As a franchise they've been nothing short of a joke for more than 20 years.0
-
Fcuk the franchise when you support the Raiders you support the Raiders whether it LA OAKLAND or ORPINGTON proper team0
-
Exactly NSS.
Bit like supporting Charlton if they moved to say Selhurst Park area...0 -
The Raiders have won 3 Superbowls....SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
0 -
Preston have won the league twice. Last time they did it was around the same time the Raiders last won the superbowl...CAFCTrev said:
The Raiders have won 3 Superbowls....SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
0
